Sqlite rowid12/24/2022 Now, perform a VACUUM on the database and run again the query: Now perform again: SELECT rowid,* FROM test INSERT INTO test (name) VALUES (‘house’) INSERT INTO test (name) VALUES (‘gregory’) INSERT INTO test (name) VALUES (‘giuly’) INSERT INTO test (name) VALUES (‘marco’) You can test this example with SQLiteManager. As always a simple example worths more than 1000 words. If you don’t want to read the whole post then just do this: Every time you create a table with sqlite make sure to have an INTEGER PRIMARY KEY AUTOINCREMENT column (the rowid column will be an alias to this one).Ī lot of people don’t realize that a rowid can change. Copying the archive locally (to, say, make a replica and strip out an index before compressing) is a very slow operation on the archive machine.I posted this article in my old blog on Sunday, Janubut I think it’s so important that I decided to re-post it again here. The only work I do on the archival dataset is add records and verify that the data has been properly backed up, as described above. Because I occasionally share the entire archive with other researchers, sqlite is a convenient container, but I don't index because I want the files to be small when I back them up and ship them around. The sqlite database is on a very slow machine with tons of disk space, and holds the total archive going back several years. I'm less worried that two corresponding records would contain different values).Ī few more probably irrelevant details: The postgres production system is on a very space-constrained machine, and can only hold about 6 months of data. Is there a better way than counting to validate that records in a specified date range stored in databases on two different systems, one in postgres, one in sqlite, contain the same data? (I presume they do, but I'm a paranoid sort, especially around the idea that my syncing process might somehow drop records.Is there a less janky way to leverage the fact that my data is sorted to get at least some of the benefits of indexing without rolling my own?.If I do decide to insert data out of date order, how can I sort the data and reset the rowids to account for that?.What events would cause the rowid of a given record to change?.Will deleting records create "holes" that sqlite will attempt to "fill in" with subsequent insertions?.Can I therefore implement my own binary search to rapidly find a record with a particular ts? (or use max(rowid) to find the maximum timestamp)?.Is rowid maintained in "insertion order" such that if my data is inserted in order of timestamp, I can assume that a higher rowid will never have a lower timestamp?.Doing a select count(*) where ts > nnn is slow on the archive (as expected), but it occurs to me that I might be able to use rowid to do a binary search for the first record where ts = nnn and then (perhaps) subtract rowids to get my count of records much faster than the ordinary select would, kind of like a home grown index (or, at very least, allow me to restrict the part of the database that needs to be searched by adding where rowid > mmm and rowid < ooo to the query. To validate that the archive is tracking with my production data, I perform a "checksum" of sorts, counting the number of records in a given date range, and comparing the archive to the production dataset. Multiple records can have the same timestamp, but the timestamp will only increase over time. Therefore, the sqlite db is unindexed.Įvery record has a timestamp (stored in epoch ms), and data is never inserted out of date order. Generally speaking, archive size is more important than archive performance. I am using this as archival backup for working data on a different system (in postgres). I have a large and growing table I'm maintaining in sqlite (250M+ rows).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |